Evaluation of Success of Stainless Steel Crowns

This examine aimed to match the medical efficacy and survival charges of the hall technique (HT), and conventional restoration (CR) for the management of occlusoproximal carious lesions in main molars.HT was a more successful technique for managing caries in main molars than CR, each for symptoms of pulpal illness and longevity of the restorations. HT is a simplified method of managing carious major molars using SSCs cemented with no native anesthesia, caries removal, or tooth preparation.


This medical research noticed 35 kids (aged 4�8 years). Exclusion criteria included signs of pulpal or periradicular pathology or systemic circumstances requiring special dental issues. For each child, a minimum of one tooth was handled with HT and one with CR. The major outcome measures have been minor and major scientific failure rates.  stainless steel crowns  and gingival scores of the tooth had been additionally evaluated. Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed ranks test have been used to match the plaque and gingival index scores for every arm. Chi-square tests had been used for comparisons of scientific outcomes, plaque-gingival index, and distribution of ICDAS classes among remedy arms (P < 0.05)..